果q排毒效果怎麼樣

ofsciencefiction,butall-too-apparentreality.atpresent,therearethreeforeignorganizationswillbeformallyannouncedtheirhumancloningexperiments,thedavosuniversityofkentuckyprofessorwhoisworkingwithitalianexperts名叫安提connollyco-operationplanintwoyearstocloneaperson.
duetothecomplexityofhumancloningmayhaveconsequences,somedevelopedcountriesinbiotechnology,arenowprohibitedtotaketheattitude,orseverelyrestricted.clintonsaid:"theadoptionofthistechnologytocopyhumanbeingsisdangerousandshouldbeputanend!"membersofthecppccnationalcommittee,chineseacademyofsciences,thenationaldirectorofthecenterforgeneresearchhongguo-fanalsomadeitclearthatoppositiontohumancloningresearch,andinfavorofcloningandcloningdistinguishbetweenpeople.
humancloning,suchaspandora'sboxisreallythedevil,asfrightening?
infact,peoplecannotaccepthumancloningexperimentsthemainreasonisthattheconceptoftraditionalethicalobstacles.forthousandsofyears,humanbeingshavebeenguidedbywayofsexualreproduction,andhumancloningisaproductofthelaboratorywascreatedbythemanipulationoflife.especiallyinthewest,"abandonedtogod,detachmentoftheadamandeve"ofcloning,butalsobyanumberofreligiousorganizations.moreover,humancloningandhumancloningwasalsocontrarytotherelationshipbetweenthetraditionalkinshipbybloodtodeterminetheethicalway.allthismakeshumancloningcannotbeethicalandmoraltraditionsofhumanitytofindasuitableshelterinplace.however,asthechineseacademyofscienceshesaid:"theemergenceofhumancloningshouldfaceuptoethicalissues,butthereisnoreasontoopposetheprogressofscienceandtechnology."owndevelopmentofhumansocietytellsusthatpeople'sconceptoftechnology-drivenupdateoftheprogressofhistory,andtotheoldconceptstoscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentconstraints,itisrigid.historyofbloodtransfusionandorgantransplantation,haveagreatethicalcontroversy,andwhenthefirsttest-tubebabywasbornin1978,theyaresetoffanuproar,butnow,peoplehavebeenabletocorrectlydealwithallthis.thisshowsthatscientificandtechnologicaldevelopmentinthefaceofup-to-dateideasanddonotbringdisastertohumanbeings,onthecontrary,itisthebenefitofmankind.onthecloningtechnology,the"therapeuticcloning"willbeintheproductionoforgansfortransplantandtocaptureaspectsofthedisease,suchasaccesstoabreakthroughinbiotechnologyandmedicinetobringaboutrevolutionarychangesintechnology.forexample,whenyourdaughterneedsabonemarrowtransplantandnoonecanprovideforher;whenyouareunfortunateenoughtolosethe5-year-oldchildandcannotescapethepain;whenyouwanttoraisetheirchildrenareunabletobirth......maybeyouwillbeabletounderstandthecloninggreatscientificvalueandpracticalsignificance.therapeuticcloningresearchandhumancloningexperimentintegritybetweenthecomplementaryandmutuallyreinforcing,andtherapeuticcloningastheendpointistheemergenceofacompletehumancloning,iftherighttouse,theyallcanandshouldbebroughttohumansocietytothegospel.
sciencehasalwaysbeenadouble-edgedsword.however,ascientificandtechnologicalprogressisreallybeneficialtohumans,thekeyliesinhowtodealwithhumanbeingsanduseit,notbecauseofthetimebeingunreasonableonthe因噎廢食.cloningtechnologyandnucleartechnologymayindeed,ascanthebenefitofmankind,butalsoharmfuleffects.however,"technologyoffear"inessence,isthefearofthewronguseoftechnology,ratherthanthefearofthetechnologyitself.atpresent,allcountriesintheworldattitudesonhumancloningandmore"ambiguous",theunitedkingdomlastyeartomorethantwo-thirdsmajorityvotetoallowcloningofhumanembryosbill,andintheunitedstates,germany,australia,isalsoheardcallingforagradualrelaxationrestrictionsontherapeuticcloningvoice.itcanbesaidthatacountrywhichwillacquirethetechnologyofhumancloning,itmeansthatthecountryhasstrengthsandtaketheinitiative,whichstartedlateinthecountrymaystillsufferthelosscannotbepredicted.aswastheunitedstatesatomicenergywillacquirethetechnology,althoughthetechnologyfromtheverybeginningtoshowitsevilside,butlaterhadtostepupthecountriesinthisareaofresearchandexperiment.fromthispointofview,takenonhumancloningexperimentisasimplenegativeattitudeworthexploring.
assoonaspeopleworryaboutcloningtechnologymatures,therewillbebadintentionswereclonedhundredsof"hitler",oranothercelebritycloningtocreateconfusion,itisamisunderstandingofcloning.humancloningisbeingcopiedgeneticcharacteristics,andacquiredbymanyfactorsaffecttheenvironmentofthinking,personalityandothersocialattributescannotbeexactlythesame,thatis,nomatterhowthedevelopmentofcloningtechnology,humancloningcanonlyphysical,butnotthesoulofhumancloningmoreover,humancloningandthecloningofhumanbeingshavetheagegap.therefore,theso-calledhumancloningisnotthefullcopy,historicalfigureswillnotrevive,therealitypeopledonothavetoworryaboutmorethana"self"to.
sheep:1996,victoria(dolly)
monkeys:injanuary2000,tetra,female
pig:inmarch2000,fivepigletspplscotland;inaugust,xena,female
cow:in2001,alphaandbeta,male
cat:theendof2001,copycat(cc),female
rat:2002
rabbit:2003,march-aprilinfranceandnorthkoreaweretoachieveindependence;
mule:inma

<< 上一页 [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] ... 下一页 >>